Ed Gerber

Ed Gerber

Professor at the Courant Institute

Um, what happened to me?

less than 1 minute read

Published:

I flatter myself to think you may have stopped by my webpage over the last year and half and wondered, what happened to Ed? No new papers? No research? Did he drop off the face of the Earth? Sort of. I was on sabbatical at Free University Berlin and Ludwig Maximillian University, Munich for an academic year!

It was an amazing experience. With the miracles of modern technology, er, Zoom, Slack, and email, research did happen (stay tuned)! Papers were published (and they did make it to the publications page)! In most ways, it wasn’t that much of a rest period (though I did have time to go running and hiking in many amazing places), and I did take a break from my website.

I’m back now. Well, have been for 3 months, but moving with a family was quite an operation. Ugh, there a still a few boxes in my office that need to get back to the apartment, but the website is back in business!

You May Also Enjoy

See the forest and the trees!

1 minute read

Published:

Congratulations to Dave Connelly, who just submitted his first paper! It is about the use of regression forest to represent atmospheric gravity wave momentum transport to JAMES! The manuscript makes two important steps forward. First, it shows that a “boosted forest” approach, where you train each subsequent decision tree on the residual (as sketched below), can out perform a “random forest” where you combine a number of decision trees, averaging the result. This was well known in the ML community, but less so in the climate sciences. Second, Dave found that techniques from interpretable AI could be used to improve the training of a data driven parameterization. Using feature importance metrics, he found that his origional boosted forest wasn’t using enough information about latitude. By forcing the method to predict the latitude as well, he could build trees that incorporate this information more effectively!

The graft-versus-host problem…

less than 1 minute read

Published:

Ofer Shamir just submitted a paper on the use of machine learning to represent atmospheric gravity wave momentum transport to QJRMS. He developed an idealized, one-dimensional model of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, where we could systematically compare different data-driven methods. In particular, how can one calibrate a data-driven scheme to work in a biased model (the graft-host problem), and how well can schemes generalize to new conditions, as in a climate change scenario?